Todays Justice System Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Todays Justice System - Essay ExampleHowever, at that place is no denying the fact that justice also happens to be a highly subjective opinion, which is often susceptible to diverse interpretations. What may seem just to a person or a group may labored unjust or partial to m either other. In that context, it will be interesting to have a look into the concept of justice as per Confucius, Machiavelli and Lao-tzu, to facilitate a bit better understanding of the coeval justice system.The Confucian concept of justice is woven around the notion of gong, which if roughly translated means impartiality (Cleary, 2000). Hence, Confucian dogmas strongly instruct the state and the justice system to resolve and solve the social conflicts and differences without re forking to any sort or form of discrimination or partiality. According to Confucius, the everyplaceall sense of channelizeion and moral wellness of any society depends on the extent to which virtue and uprightness manage to perme ate the social, commercial and face-to-face spheres of life (Cleary, 2000). Therefore, the people only tend to develop a strong affinity with propriety if there prevails a sense of justice in any society. ... Therefore, the people only tend to develop a strong affinity with propriety if there prevails a sense of justice in any society. It is silent that justice to Confucius meant absolute uprightness and total absence of any sort of favoritism. Thus, in the given context, the fair and equitable distribution and allocation of national resources and opportunities of growth constitute an integral part of the Confucian concept of justice (Cleary, 2000). Confucius favored a concept of justice that distinctly favored the marginalized and weaker sections of the society and ensured their well organism and safety. Contrary to Confucius, the Machiavellian concept of justice is blatantly opportunistic. Machiavelli holds that the means are always subservient to the ends (Machiavelli, 1984). Thus, the direct premise of this line of reasoning is that the state or the political permission can resort to any line of action while dispensing justice, provide the delivered verdict or conclusion aid and abets the political authority in achieving its coveted and vested aims and objectives (Machiavelli, 1984). Therefore, according to the Machiavellian notion of justice, justice does not happen to be a means to disseminate a sense of fairness in the society, but a tool to advance the interests of those in power. Justice merely dwindles to being a convenient tool rather then being an exalted institution and a reliable pillar of social stability. To Machiavelli, virtue and fairness meant any affaire that furthered the narrow interests of the state (Machiavelli, 1984). In the Machiavellian concept of justice, preservation and protection of the realm takes preponderance over everything else.Lao-Tzus concept