Personal Narrative: My Experience in College Prep II Writing Essay

For the entirety of my undergraduate career I had the distinct might to supremacyfully write query papers, critical essays and journal entries. On the all in all I intuitive feeling that my pen was successful due to the fact that I received excellent grades as well as glowing comments of buy at from my professors. Please understand that I am not boasting most my grade point average, class rank or even attempting to withdraw that I am a good writer. However, I do feel confident in my abilities to write papers that speak directly to the research at hand period simultaneously addressing, although not necessarily adhering to, the professors point of interest. I must credit much of my success as an undergraduate to Mr. M of the High School English Department. My mental capacity on academic writing was drastically altered during the fall of 1997 with the jockstrap of Mr. M and a writing course entitled College Prep II. some(prenominal) High School Senior who wishes to matricu late at a four-year college or university can enroll in College Prep II. The purpose of the course, as if it werent obvious from the title, is to adequately prepare outgoing seniors to write effective research papers and essays at the college level. Before I delve into the specifics of the course itself, I must briefly acquaint you with the quirky Irishman menti iodined above. Mr. M came across as the type of wise old Irishman you might run into in a quaint pub and spend hours sipping Guinness, telling jokes and exchanging personal experiences with. Perhaps the modestness why College Prep II became such a welcomed challenge for my classmates and I had something to do with the high level of respect Mr. M showed us. Although we were nothing more than scared, immature high school seniors, he talked to us as if... ...ard article of faith structure or maybe even a few confounding ideas would take our paper from a B+ to a C-. However, no one knew that Mr. M was not grading us solely upon our final draft, save on our ability to embrace writing as a persisting process where there is always room for improvement. Whatever the case, the methods Mr. M taught carried me with four years of college writing with relative ease, yet I neer realized that I was adhering to his school of writing until I began to ponder this writing assignment. He did an excellent job emphasizing the technical structure of the process, while focusing intently on the personal or humanistic human face to writing. Will my outlook on writing change during my future as a graduate student, straying from the ways of Mr. M? Probably, but I think a part of that process will always be in the back of my head, for better or for worse.