The Coal Miners in France During the Second Empire Essay -- World Hist

The Coal Miners in France During the Second Empire In this paper I will explain why revolt by the labor against bang-upin Second Empire France failed. To explain the situation, I will rehearseMarxs theory of capital accumulation as he presents it in swell. Alsoimportant in the theoretical description of this phenomena is the role of tradition and the way its restraints deviate from those of the economy inthis French society. Based on this description I will discuss how thefunction of management is obligate by the economy and traditions inherentin a society. From these considerations I will suggest additional elementsand relationships necessary for social relations change to fall out theinstitutional conditions in which they exist. Terminology rel issue to a theoretical account of an event is given byTalcott Parsons in The Structure of Social Action. Here, treat isdescribed as a system that may be shared into unit acts. The unit actconsists of four elements. First t here is an agent, or actor. Second, theact has an stopping point which is a future state of affairs or goal towards which theaction is oriented. Third, there is a situation where the trends ofdevelop- ment differ from the end towards which the action is oriented. Thesituation is composed of two elements the conditions are that which theactor cannot ready in accordance with his end, and the means are thatover which he does not have control. Finally there is a relation betweenthese elements where a situation allows alterna- tive means to the end,the course is selected from the normative orientation of the actor.(Parsons, 1968 44) In rescript to account for the interrelationships in the historical event... ... change. Events willsubsequently no longer happen but attain meaning in the roost of the sourcethat the charismatic element advocates. This change in normativeorientations coitus to the change in other elements of the process mustinessbe reflected in the ideology. The ideology of social change may not simplybe a reiffication of the old in a reactionary form. The substance of theideology, in being a response to the divergence caused by the economy andpolity, must be such as to transcend that which came before it. This finalcondition, specifying the relations between elements necessary forrevolutionary change, may only be derived in a society which is neither anorganic, composite whole nor one of hit-or-miss atomistic ends. Rather, thesociety must be one where the normative orientation for mediating betweenconditions and means is one of consensus.