Self-Preservation Is the First Law of Nature

Self-preservation is the first-class honours degree law of temperament. The above quote is an often heard line regarding an various(prenominal)s response to the demands of constitution. It can be said that self-preservation and security measures surpass the need to get along with independently and lightly of the constraints of others. This is but one of the ship canal one can attempt to balance out the impulse to morsel independently but also with the need for security. The idea of resolving these seemingly irreconcilable needs is brought up in Shakespeargons play juncture, wherein he writes of two main char acquiters who attempt to resolve their need for independence and security.The playwright utilizes character to suggest that in the attempt to settle independence and security, it is in conclusion the need for self-preservation that takes immediate priority. A character who is faced with the task of join his desire to act independently with his need for security is Hamlet. Hamlet shows a melancholy side to him when confronted by these opposing demands. From his soliloquies, the reader is immersed in the thoughts of a pensive young man who struggles with the need for sanctuary and granting immunity.He debates whether to be, or non to be, and although he does not hold his life at a tholes fee, his heart harbors discontent with the unweeded garden that grows to seed. It is seen that he is conflicted with the demands frozen upon him by his dead bewilder, as surface as that of Claudius and the people of Denmark who want to course on from the passing, and he struggles with the desire to resolve his need for security and autonomy in this matter.From this, it is seen that Hamlet values self-preservation over independence as his soliloquies are only words and not actions, and as such, are the product of his admit safety thereby allowing him to immerse himself in the safety of this induce thoughts. Furthermore, it is manifest that he is a postponer in his quest for independent action, and this eventually turns out to be his tragic flaw. Even though he is set upon the task of avenging his fathers foul and most unnatural death, he stands unpregnant of his cause. It is clear from this that Hamlet procrastinates in bon ton to carry on his own considerably existence and acts in his own self interest despite the desire to take revenge upon Claudius for his fathers death. He does not spread over to act independently when his security is put at risk, especially in the presence of a smiling, damned villain, so he procrastinates in order to put off dealing with matters that might jeopardize his wellbeing. Conversely however, Hamlet has been shown to overhear an impulsive streak in the face of settling his desires for safety and freedom.This is clearly seen when he follows the shadowiness despite the apparitions intentions being unknown. The ghost could be the acidulate of the devil, only to condemn Hamlet to his ow n personal oblivion, however, he stillness actively seeks out the spectre because he wishes to learn the truth of the matters concerning his fathers death. As well, he displays decisive action when he says the fail dead, for a ducat, dead. This violent and impulsive action results in the death of Polonius who was eavesdropping on his and Gertrudes conversation.In both of these examples it is seen that Hamlet acts independently and decisively, with the underlying intent being that of self-preservation. He seeks out the ghosts intentions because of his desire to feel securely despite the rule of Claudius, and he kills Polonius only because he was acting on behalf of his own primal instinct to preserve himself. From these examples it is inferred that in his desire to submit safety and the need for independent action, critical point acts impulsively to secure the security he craves.Lastly, it is seen that Hamlet exudes an aura of intelligence and quick wit when foreign by the dau nting task of reconciling safety and independence. He has an inborn ability to transform a turn of events to his advantage as is witnessed when the players come to put on a show. He utilizes them in order to dumbfound the conscience of the king, wherein he collects enough evidence to cement the validity of the ghosts statements. His ability to think quickly is invaluable, as this deems his wellbeing a top priority while still unifying his need to act freely as well.Another character who deals with the prospect of reconciling his need to act independently with his need for security is Claudius. Un give care Hamlet who is a procrastinator in his deeds, Claudius is a man of decisive action. This is clearly seen when he decides to pay off Hamlet sent to England with fiery quickness overdue to his antic disposition. It is unpatterned that Claudius does not deliberate on matters that require immediate attention as hell have Hamlet hence to-night. From this, it can be inferred that Claudius wishes o preserve himself against a suspicious threat as he manages to actively deal with his adversary as well. In combination with his decisive action, it is known that Claudius is incredibly manipulative in his desire to unify freedom and safety. When Laertes makes his return to Denmark with all intention of avenging his father by killing Claudius, he does everything in his personnel to giveLaertess soul its due content. He placates Laertess indignant personality and as a result, Laertes end up ruld by Claudius. From this, it is seen that Claudius utilizes handling for the sake of self-preservation while keeping his own independent actions an ulteriot motive. As well, Claudius has displayed a creative and strategic ingenuity when it comes to reconciling his own security and free will. He is determined to be rid of Hamlet, but his strategic nature indicates that he will do so by way of a cunning scheme. When Laertes and Claudius plan hamlets demise, Claudius mainta ins a skillful overture that will allow purposeto hold there. It is evidenced that Claudius utilizes his own strategic nature in order to act for sake of saving his own flesh. turn in the process of working towards acting independently, he also manages to keep his safety a top priority which is his ultimate motive against a dangerous opposition such as Hamlet. Lastly, it is seen that in his pursuit of wedlock his own independent action and security, Claudius has shown a paranoid and guilt feelings struck side to him.He is responsible for the death of his own brother as his stronger guilt defeats his stronger intent. However, he cannot truly repent as his words are without thought, and as a result, they will never to heaven go. It is seen that because of his desire to remain secure in not only the eyes of the public, but as well as Hamlet and Gertrude, he cannot openly admit to his wrong doings. This is due to the fact that in doing so, he will risk the unbridled and justified displeasure of hamlet which will compromise Claudiuss sport on the throne.Just like a scavenger whose actions are cowardly in order to live another day, Claudius too, lives securely to rule in the coming days due to his own inability to act independently. In conclusion, it is seen that in the attempt to reconcile ones desire for independent action as well as security, it is in the end the self-preserving instinct that takes immediate control. This is clearly evidenced by both hamlet and Claudius in Shakespeares play Hamlet, who although take contrary approaches to this matter, fundamentally have the same mentality of keeping their desire to be secure the completion priority.It is derived from the play that it is almost always security that takes precedence over freedom of actions however it is up to the members of society to decide for themselves how they wish to approach their own attempt to reconcile their own need for security as well as the desire to act independently. Ther e are many different approaches and ways to attempt this harmonization, and as such, each is tailored to an individuals unique ability to decipher what it is that one really values and desires.